11/3/2022 0 Comments Harrison mixbus 32c vs pro tools
Oh it's unlikely anyone here has heard of it: MRGUS. MRGUS is still floating around the internet if you have a 25 year old PC rig with an Ultrasound to try it on For many years I wanted to get back to developing my own DAW but about 10 years ago I pretty much gave up on it as what is the point when you have so many polished DAWs around already and it would probably take you at least 10 years to even catch up to where they are at in 2020. #HARRISON MIXBUS 32C VS PRO TOOLS CODE#I always wanted to continue development but got busy with school and then a career where I pretty much write the same code a DAW uses, but it runs the audio engine in video games. So it was basically a 14-track Fostex type deal. The only controls were pan and volume per track. It could play 14 44.1 kHz tracks back at once though while recording. Obviously it was extremely crude compared to what we have available now, but hey, there was probably nothing better available at the price point at the time It could only record 8-bit due to hardware limitations. #HARRISON MIXBUS 32C VS PRO TOOLS FULL#So when the first consumer grade PC sound card came out that allowed full duplex recording (Gravis Ultrasound) I spent a summer between computer science semesters banging this thing out. Having used the Fostex type 4 track recorders at home in the late 80s and having an interest in computers/programming I had always wanted to create an affordable DAW, as there really wasn't any such thing available for PC at that time. So what is everyone's preferred DAW - and have you ever made the switch to a different DAW at any point in your time as a mix engineer?Ĭlick to expand.Oh it's unlikely anyone here has heard of it: MRGUS. #HARRISON MIXBUS 32C VS PRO TOOLS SOFTWARE#Also it is pretty cool just having my hardware sync and work harmoniously with the software with no really additional setup (I love using DAW mode on the mixer to mix my track using the the board as opposed to the mouse/keyboard). I am going to miss some of the Virtual Instruments - but honestly I find StudioOne is just a better mixing experience overall, and I like the ability to take my Windows based demo projects easily over to my Mac based studio with no issues and things like the Gain Envelope and Scene saving of version 5 look to be workflow game changers for me. I am likely going to be upgrading to version 5 of StudioOne in the next couple of months, and am planning on doing a massive port of all my Logic projects over to StudioOne over the next couple of months. However - over the last couple of years I have been learning and recording exclusively with StudioOne Pro 4.5 - and the few times I have opened older projects in Logic X I am surprised at how clunky the Logic interface actually feels now. But I never found StudioOne to be a serious contender in comparison to my time with Logic. Now I have had various versions of StudioOne Artist over the last near decade or so - and have used them on my gaming PC to create various demos when I don't feel like sitting down in the main studio. For reference - I learned on GarageBand / Logic 7 Express and stuck with Logic (moving on to Pro at Logic 9) all the way until about 2 years ago when I purchased a StudioLive Series 3 mixer and got StudioOne Pro 4 with it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |